Looking at that quote again, what seemed simple and basic, within the framework of the Tao becomes rich with meaning, yet quite simple.

When a Westerner tries to study the Tao, the tendency is to try to describe one thing in terms of the others (to use knowledge). The Taoist says "Look at this method, some components take place. They either have similarity or not. It means, the difference, which separates the components, precedes similarity. Nevertheless, there are situations when no difference/similarity is seen and, like the result of this, there is no analogy (Zehou, 1999).

For example, thinking has no visible analogy. Explain this situation in such a way thinking does not yield cognitive initiative to study itself. The paradox is it reveals a classif

Notice, a kind of practical activity is known as 'cognition without initiative.

While we can not study thinking by analogy, let study antagonism by analogy.

Thus we can see that to follow the one Grand Way is to not accept any other way but the One Grand Way. There are not two alternative or conflicted strategies. The One Grand Way is like abstract borders to limit many (maybe, all) cognitive efforts. The fact is that when the alternative takes place objectively and it looks like an idea a priori or information a priori. Independently from a theoretical explication, it doubles cognitive activity absolutely practically and thereby confirms the Tao.