e numbers have either relocated to the United States or they have established production facilities in the United States, while American firms have, also in large numbers, either closed down or scaled down their Canadian operations. One result of these actions have been a reduction in the level of Canadian exports to the United States. Unfortunately, the resulting loss of jobs in Canada has dampened Canadian demand for American products. Therefore, to date, the CanadianUnited States Free Trade Agreement has had a relatively neutral impact on the American economy, while it has had a detrimental impact on the Canadian economy.and the American economy will be saddled with increased welfare and dislocation costs. Based on the latest surveys of consumer confidence, the most optimistic GNP (gross national product) projections for 1992 call for an increase in personal consumption expenditures of 4.5 percent over 1991. The most optimistic projections also call for an increase in gross domestic investment in 1992 of approximately 10 percent. With mortgage interest rates already on the rise again in mid1992, and with business enterprises holding off on investment in the wake of continuing weak consumer demand, it now appears that gross domestic investment will not increase to the extent usually anticipated in a recovery year. In view of the fact that 1992 is an election year and that if the American economy does not exhibit signs of a strong recovery by summer, it may be anticipated that the Bush Administration, regardless of its protestations to the contrary at the present time, will increase governmental spending dramatically, and that the Democratcontrolled Congress will cooperate with the Administration. While the Democrats will not want to help President Bush, neither will they want to be seen as a drag on economic recovery. Thus, it may be anticipated that governmental purchases in 1992 will increase by some sixpercent over 1991 levels. This increa |