Inequalities in the Workplace Controversies
The new data analyzed by the authors were collected for the period extending from January 1987 through February 1992. A large department of the federal government was the participating organization. Data were collected in relation to 32 positions that were filled in the department during the relevant period, and to the actions of the review panels that assessed the qualifications, and the actions of the selection officials who made promotion recommendations in relation to the 438 applicants for the 32 vacancies.

The researchers hypothesized that gender would influence promotion decisions in such a way that women would receive less favorable outcomes than men in the selection of personnel for top-management positions. The research results did not support this hypothesis. Rather, the researchers found that employment in the department (positive effect), years in top grade (negative effect), and performance appraisal rating exerted significant influences on the selection decision.

The researchers also hypothesized that gender would influence promotion decisions in such a way that women would be rated less favorably than men in the job-related criteria used to make selections for top-management positions. The research results did not support this hypothesis. Rather, the researchers found that the application of the job-related criteria within the department favored women.

 

While downsizing holds to potential to create outcomes (higher profits) that will please stockholders, downsizing almost always is perceived as creating adverse outcomes for employees. Employees either are downsized out of a job, or surviving employees are forced to assume greater organizational responsibilities. When downsizing does cause operations to become more productive, such productivity improvement is attained at the expense of an often extensive reorganization and employee discontent.

Bilts, J. H., and Gottfredson, L. S. "Equality or Lasting Inequality?" Transaction Social Science and Modern Society 27 (1990), 4-11.

Studies also have found that stress is often higher among blue-collar workers than among managerial personnel. Job level, associated with job status, was found to be tied to self-esteem. Lower self-esteem was associated with higher levels of stress and lower levels of employee morale. Even on the job, job underload creates as much stress as does job overload. Job underload means that an individual is not challenged in his or her work, and may be subject to periods of boredom, or fatigue stemming from boredom. Job underload was found to create higher levels of anxiety, depression, and physical illness than did job overload.

 
2236
9
 
   
 
 
   
    Some topics in this essay  
 
    Ethnicity Affirmative | Powell Butterfield | Blue-Collar Downsizing | Quaker Oats | Circuit Court | | Sexual Harassment | Law Journal | sexual harassment | affirmative action | HR Focus | Handling Engineering | federal law | top-management positions | american organizations | glass ceiling | racial ethnic | employment discrimination | quaker oats | circuit court | females non-anglo males | seventh circuit court | bases skill levels | stricter policy sexual | effects past discrimination--affirmative |  
   
 
 
 
   
    Get Better Grades!  
 
   
 
   
 
   
    Saved Papers  
 
    Save your essays here so you can locate them quickly!  
   
 
   
    Testimonials  
 
   
"I was in a real bind and your site helped me to come up with ideas for my paper."
Brian T.
 
"It's nice to be able to find information so quickly and easily."
Jillian T.
 
"I enjoy reading other writers papers to get their perspective on things. It makes writing my own paper so much easier."
Cindy A.
 
"I've used this site for 2 semesters and I'll be back next year for sure!"
Liz R.
 
"This site rocks! I got an A thanks to you helping with my writers block."
Sara B.
 
 
   
 
 
Copyright © 1999 - 2013 CollegeTermPapers.com. All Rights Reserved. DMCA