Johnstown Corporation, Small Steel Manufacturer Case
Approximately three-quarters (75.7 percent) of the output of the integrated group is produced by four firms·USX-US Steel Group (26.2 percent), Bethlehem Steel (20.1 percent), Inland Steel (18.2 percent), and Stelco (11.2 percent). The integrated steelmaker group, thus, is structured as an oligopoly (Katz, 1994b, p. 1405). Six firms in the general steelmaker group account for 72 percent of the total output of the group·Nucor (21.5 percent), Commercial Metals (15 percent), Allegheny Ludlum (10.3 percent), Worthington Industries (10.3 percent), Lukens (8.4 percent), and Oregon Steel (6.5 percent). Thus, the general steelmaker group is also structured as an oligopoly.

Within the integrated group of steelmakers, the use of steel service centers to enhance distribution efficiency is used effectively to differentiate their products within the context of service. The general steelmakers depend more on product mix to differentiate themselves from competitors (Katz, 1994a, p. 604).

With respect to the American steel industry, both the integrated and general groups, formidable cost barriers to entry exist with respect to economies of scale production facilities and specialized equipment. Product differentiation costs are not significant as barriers to entry into the American steel market. Environmental protection regulations imposed by government create costs for steelmakers that act as legal barriers to entry into the American steel in

 

Katz, H. S. "Steel (Integrated) Industry." Value Line Investment Survey, 11 February 1994b, 1405.

From the mid-1970s through the mid-1980s, corporations began to rely more heavily on externally generated capital. In 1975, as an example, internal sources provided approximately 70 percent of the total capital raised by American corporations, while, by 1982, this proportion had declined to approximately 57.5 percent.

Taggart, P. W., Alexander, R., and Arnold, R. M. Taking Your Company Public. New York: American Management Association, 1991.

A firm participating in the American steel production industry would find it unreasonably costly to exit the industry. On the one hand, prohibitive costs would preclude the relocation of facilities to another market where they might be used profitably by the firm. On the other hand, technological innovation causes steel production facilities to lose value at a significant rate, as they age, causing it to be somewhat unlikely that production facilities could be sold without incurring a significant loss. The steel production industry in the United States, therefore, is not a contestable market because of the high barriers to exit that characterize the industry (Stundza, 1993b, p. B17).

(2) Return on total capital: -1.8 percent.

 
3748
15
 
   
 
 
   
    Some topics in this essay  
 
    McGuigan Kretlow | Oregon Steel | Inland Steel | Firm American | Korea American | United Steel | B17 American | Worthington Industries | Reagan Administration | Johnstown Corporation | american steel | convertible bond | total capital | steel industry | common stock | value convertible | american steel industry | market value | return total capital | value convertible bond | return total | net profit | shareholders' equity | profit percent sales | percent 2 return |  
   
 
 
 
   
    Get Better Grades!  
 
   
 
   
 
   
    Saved Papers  
 
    Save your essays here so you can locate them quickly!  
   
 
   
    Testimonials  
 
   
"I was in a real bind and your site helped me to come up with ideas for my paper."
Brian T.
 
"It's nice to be able to find information so quickly and easily."
Jillian T.
 
"I enjoy reading other writers papers to get their perspective on things. It makes writing my own paper so much easier."
Cindy A.
 
"I've used this site for 2 semesters and I'll be back next year for sure!"
Liz R.
 
"This site rocks! I got an A thanks to you helping with my writers block."
Sara B.
 
 
   
 
 
Copyright © 1999 - 2013 CollegeTermPapers.com. All Rights Reserved. DMCA