Kyoto Protocol Analysis
Subsequent COP have been held in Berlin (1995), Geneva (1996), Kyoto (1997), Buenos Aires (1998), Bonn (1999) and Hague (2000) and Marrakech (2001). These accords have dealt with a variety of issues that are important to all nations or specific ones who take issue with some of the Kyoto Protocol’s regulations. George W. Bush, being elected president between the Hague and Bonn accords, immediately announced that he “had no intention of ratifying the Kyoto Protocol” (History 2). This threw the climate control regime into disarray and doubt. This is because the Kyoto Protocol will only be enforceable after it has been ratified by at least 55 members of the U. N. Framework Convention on Climate Control (History 2). This includes the U. S., a country that is responsible for 36% of the 55% of total carbon dioxide emissions accumulating from developed nations (History 2).

After some technical issues were resolved at the Marrakech accords in 2001, the Buenos Aires Plan of Action were brought to completion. This opens the possibilities for more countries to ratify the Protocol, giving it the power to enforce its provisions. However, without ratification of the Protocol by nearly all developed countries it is unlikely it will be adopted. After 55 countries ratify the Protocol, it will enter force 90 days later.

There debate over global warming continues to occur,

 

The Kyoto Protocol must resolve many issues among countries needed for ratification before it can go into force. These issues run a range of topics but include such things as language on mechanisms pertaining to the Clean Development Mechanism, the nature of the authority relationship between the Kyoto regime and the WTO with respect to development issues, and the tougher enforcement of already agreed upon provisions. For instance, at the Bonn accords the provisions at COP-6 were defined as legally binding. No one still knows what this means in with respect to a Protocol that remains ungratified. An agreement was reached that those parties that failed to meet their emissions reduction targets in the first compliance period (2008-2012) would have to make up for that failure in the second compliance period plus an additional penalty of 30 per cent (Politics 1). However, as one expert points out, “No second compliance period or emissions targets for that period have been negotiated, so that the agreed enforcement provision would seem to have little effect” (Politics 1). Therefore, despite the goal of implementing the Kyoto Protocol from the top-down, it appears it will still evolve from the bottom-up with countries like the U. S. and Canada having an influence over future regime regulations. Nevertheless, the evidence clearly points to the destruction of the planet from approximately only one century of industrialization. All of the countries hesitating to ratify the Kyoto Protocol have underlying economic reasons. Canada should not be among those countries who a future Bill Clinton-like candidate might say to the current Prime Minister, “Without the environment there can be no economy, stupid.” It is time the world’s industrialized nation’s leaders awoke to this common sense fact and worked together to ratify the Kyoto Protocol in a way that manifests significant regulations aimed at lowering greenhouse gas emissions and stalling the global warming effect.
 
2315
9
 
   
 
 
   
    Some topics in this essay  
 
    Kyoto Protocol | Organization WTO | Atlantic According | Development Mechanism | Global Warming | Climate Change | European Union | PROTOCOL ANALYSIS | Howard Australian | Jean Chretien | global warming | kyoto protocol | greenhouse gas | greenhouse gas emissions | ratify protocol | gas emissions | prime minister | dioxide emissions | carbon dioxide | history 2 | compliance period | carbon dioxide emissions | usa jan 6 | countries ratify protocol | jan 6 1999 |  
   
 
 
 
   
    Get Better Grades!  
 
   
 
   
 
   
    Saved Papers  
 
    Save your essays here so you can locate them quickly!  
   
 
   
    Testimonials  
 
   
"I enjoy reading other writers papers to get their perspective on things. It makes writing my own paper so much easier."
Cindy A.
 
"I've used this site for 2 semesters and I'll be back next year for sure!"
Liz R.
 
"This site rocks! I got an A thanks to you helping with my writers block."
Sara B.
 
"I was in a real bind and your site helped me to come up with ideas for my paper."
Brian T.
 
"It's nice to be able to find information so quickly and easily."
Jillian T.
 
 
   
 
 
Copyright © 1999 - 2013 CollegeTermPapers.com. All Rights Reserved. DMCA