WORLD WAR II-"National War Strategy"
On any level strategy, according to Lykke, is comprised of three concepts that are interconnected in a triangular relationship. The ends are the objectives or goals that leaders hope to attain. The ways represent the second leg of strategy or exactly how and through which action plans the leaders hope to attain their ends. Finally, the means represent the power or resources the leaders hope to employ in order arrive at their ends. To summarize the interrelationship of the three triangle legs representing strategy; the ways utilize the means to achieve the ends. According to Lykke, the best any strategy can guarantee is a “favorable balance against failure” and to reduce risk of failure the ends, means and ways must as balanced as possible (Yarger 7).

Examining World War II it is easy to see the division of strategy in the US on the national, national military and theater levels. It is also possible to discover the ends, ways and means employed at each level. While the best combination of objectives (ends), concepts (ways) and resources (means) are sought in formulating strategy at any level, the combination must still be subjected to the combined measuring stick of suitability, feasibility and acceptability. These three standards are used to determine whether the combination of objectives, conce

 

If we analyze a further stage of development (of which there were too many to fully cover here) in America’s strategy formulation during World War II we also see the comprehensiveness of strategy where the external environment is concerned. After the fall of France in 1940 created a change of political/policy climate because American sensibilities were greatly affected by this external development. Policy would also be changed with the repeal of the Neutrality Act. While this would not crystallize an immediate national strategy as it did when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor (after which there was no division of national values or sentiment), it did crystallize an immediate reaction that at least transformed the strategy from being reactive to proactive. When French forces fell the isolationist forces had to agree that it was necessary to build up military arms and the military in the interests of self-protection and the security of the Western hemisphere. As Roosevelt named Henry L. Stimson secretary of war he basically stated that the policy/politics the US was adopting towards Europe was of a bipartisan nature (i.e., unified) and one geared toward aiding the British and French. The objectives (ends) were to begin preparing how (ways) to use the resources (means) to assist Britain and France. Immediately, the impact was felt on the next strategy level below as the national military strategy could move forward. Stimson now knew unequivocally military strategy ends were to assist the British and French in defeating their aggressors since the military represented the power to achieve national strategic objectives. His first ways of securing these objectives were to “increase military appropriations and to install a system of universal military training” (Kirkpatrick 469). This demonstrates how US strategy was not proactive and represented crisis management before the French fell, but for future events their strategy would allow for proactive planning.

Where n

 
1988
8
 
   
 
 
   
    Some topics in this essay  
 
    War II | Military Strategy | British French | Strategy Roosevelts | Britain France | Winston Churchill | World War | Pearl Harbor | Army Current | Security Strategy | national military | military strategy | world war | national military strategy | world war ii | war ii | national strategy | theater strategy | strategy level | strategy national | formulating strategy | strategy national military | resources means | conflict national strategy | strategy theater strategy |  
   
 
 
 
   
    Get Better Grades!  
 
   
 
   
 
   
    Saved Papers  
 
    Save your essays here so you can locate them quickly!  
   
 
   
    Testimonials  
 
   
"I was in a real bind and your site helped me to come up with ideas for my paper."
Brian T.
 
"It's nice to be able to find information so quickly and easily."
Jillian T.
 
"I enjoy reading other writers papers to get their perspective on things. It makes writing my own paper so much easier."
Cindy A.
 
"I've used this site for 2 semesters and I'll be back next year for sure!"
Liz R.
 
"This site rocks! I got an A thanks to you helping with my writers block."
Sara B.
 
 
   
 
 
Copyright © 1999 - 2013 CollegeTermPapers.com. All Rights Reserved. DMCA