Falk in Jesus the Pharisee
The Shammai followers' concern was on one hand with Jews and strict observance of the details of Mosaic Law, and on the other with anti-Roman Jewish revolutionary activities, notably in their support of the Zealots.

Falk (8) says that Christian thought developed out of Bet Hillel interpretations of the law, which were in dialogue and contention with Bet Shammai interpretations. Bet Hillel thought was meant to cover the moral and civil behavior of both Jews and Gentiles under the so-called Noahide Commandments, the name for seven laws aimed, in general, at achieving social justice given to Adam and Noah, long before the appearance of Moses (4). The 12th-century Jewish scholar Maimonides, as well as the 18th-century rabbi Emden, found no contradiction between Noahide Laws and Christian moral tradition, partly because they were always meant to cover Gentiles and Jews alike, a fact completely consistent with claims by Jesus and Paul that the new religion would not be confined to Jews but would be universal in scope.

Bet Shammai were indeed the Pharisees and priests that Jesus of Nazareth and Paul of Tarsus had to contend with. We shall in fact seek to demonstrate that Paul the Apostle's insistence that Gentiles be admitted into the early Christian church was based on Bet Hillel's position that righteous Gentiles merit salvation (Falk 8-9).

The inclusiveness of the new religion would explain Jesus's claim that he had come not to destroy the law (for Jews) but to

 

fulfill it (inviting Gentiles to join Jews in a community of God's favor). Jesus of Nazareth was presenting a method for Jews and Gentiles to adopt a common moral code. The innovation did not mean that Jews would be freed from Jewish law and monotheistic morality, but rather that Gentiles need not be ipso facto excluded from salvation traditionally held to be accessible to the Jews. One is reminded, too, of the Pauline declaration (Gal. 3.2) that there should be a religion neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, but one community in Christ Jesus.

As a practical matter Judaism was pretty much subsumed by Christianity in the West after the apostolic period, with the decisive act being considered the deliberate abdication of Judaism by Paul and Jesus. But Falk suggests that this formulation makes too much of the differences and not enough of the confluences between Judaism and Christianity, especially if Jesus is aligned with Bet Hillel and the Noahide tradition and in practical terms arrayed against Bet Shammai thought. Further to this point, Falk notes that "many authorities" believe that Jesus and Paul were aware of the Essenes, in whose settlement the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered. What is to be noted about this is that the Essenes, generally pious, were far from being Zealots, generally militant and generally associated with Bet Shammai.

 
910
4
 
   
 
 
   
    Some topics in this essay  
 
    Bet Shammai | Jews Gentiles | Bet Hillel | Christians Citing | Hillel Judaism | Bet Hillel's | Judaism Christianity | Apostles Falk | Jesus Pharisee | Adam Noah | bet shammai | bet hillel | bet hillel judaism | falk cites | jewish law | judaism christianity | meant cover | jesus falk | hillel judaism | jews gentiles | century ce |  
   
 
 
 
   
    Get Better Grades!  
 
   
 
   
 
   
    Saved Papers  
 
    Save your essays here so you can locate them quickly!  
   
 
   
    Testimonials  
 
   
"I was in a real bind and your site helped me to come up with ideas for my paper."
Brian T.
 
"It's nice to be able to find information so quickly and easily."
Jillian T.
 
"I enjoy reading other writers papers to get their perspective on things. It makes writing my own paper so much easier."
Cindy A.
 
"I've used this site for 2 semesters and I'll be back next year for sure!"
Liz R.
 
"This site rocks! I got an A thanks to you helping with my writers block."
Sara B.
 
 
   
 
 
Copyright © 1999 - 2013 CollegeTermPapers.com. All Rights Reserved. DMCA