The play “Twelve Angry Men”, By Reginald Rose, is a play about 12 jurors that in an uncomfortable room have to discuss a life and death case about a boy that is accused or killing the jurors do not really know eachother to talk to and wish they were anywhere but inthat jury room. Every juror has a different emotional pattern that makes the play interesting. Inmy opinion there were 3 main jurors in the jury room: Juror 8, Juror 3 and Juror 9. Juror 8 isimportant because he is smart, brave, and fair. Juror 3 was important because he was theantagonist, he was mean, and he was intolerant. Juror 9 was important because he wasn’t afraidof confronting other jurors. Juror 8 was a very important juror, he was the protagonist. He was the one that proved the truth.Juror 8 was very smart, he bought a knife similar to the one used in the crime to prove that iseasy to get an identical knife, and he proved that it was impossible for the old man to make it tothe scene of the crime in 15 seconds like he testified. Juror 8 was also brave. He was the only one that voted not guilty in the first vote and he standedfor what he believed in and confronted everybody. In addition, Juror 8 was also fair. He said “It’s not easy for me to raise my hand and send a boyoff to die with out talking about it first” when he was the only one that voted not guilty in thefirst vote. He also listened to everyone’s opinions and never insulted anyone. Juror 3 was also a very important juror in the jury room. Juror 3 was the antagonist. He was the main enemy of Juror 8 and he was trying to keep peoplefrom believing that the boy was not guilty. Juror 3 was also mean. He wanted everyone to think the way he did, and lost his temperwhenever they didn’t. In addition, Juror 3 was also intolerant. He didn’t want to listen to anybody’s opinions and inthe discussion that he had with Juror 8 on page 147 in the b...
