ook, it seemed that he personallywanted the kid to die. Another very important juror in the jury room was Juror 9. Juror 9 was a fair man. He voted notguilty because he had a reasonable doubt in his mind and he listened to everyone’s opinions, Juror 9 was also smart. He made a reasonable doubt by saying that the old man might of lied toget attention because he noticed that he was a quiet, frightened, insignificant man who hasprobably never been nothing all his life. He also remembered that the woman in the train hadbifocals, and that she never took them off. that made a reasonable doubt on everyone’s mindbecause it would of been very hard for the woman in the train to see the crime because shetestified that she saw the boy kill hi father while she was trying to sleep and no one sleeps withtheir glasses on. In addition, he wasn’t afraid to confront other jurors . He was the first one to support Juror 8and he didn’t care what others said and when he made some points, such as the old man and thebifocals, he didn’t care what others said. In conclusion, Juror 8 is important because he is smart, brave and fair. Juror 8 was the mainreason why the truth was proven, that’s why he is the protagonist, he standed for what hebelieved in until the truth was proven. Juror 3 was the antagonist. He was mean and intolerant. I think the main reason why he was somean and intolerant is because his son wasn’t a good son and that made him have a bad image ofyoung kids, that’s why he voted guilty, because in a way he thought that the accused was like hisson. Juror 9 was fair, smart, and he wasn’t afraid of confronting other jurors. ...
