estion at all. He even mentions in the article that the moral questions of whether the Allies should have bombed Auschwitz in a debate that will rage on. Kitchens explains that there is no real answer to that debate at all.Instead Kitchen goes about explaining his argument using facts and research to back up his own argument and thesis. The pieces of information that I wish Kitchens had included were statements from survivors of Auschwitz with their opinion about the bombing question? Would they have been in favor of an attack if it meant that many of the prisoners may have been killed in the attack? Or would the survivors have wanted to risk waiting out the rest of the war? I think it would have been interesting to see the perspective of some people who lived through the horror of Auschwitz. I found Kitchens article to be very informative and well written. I found him to be a very capable historian because of the extensive research and analysis that went into this article. I would definitely recommend this article to anyone who is interested in learning more about the Allies actions with regards to the Holocaust....
