e published about Prince Charles' affair and about how each had separate lovers, which did have some truth to it. After all of these stories came to life things finally lead to the real truth being told, which was what the tabloids had actually printed in the first place, and to the divorce of probably one of the most famous couples in the world. The stories ends with the media hounds following the Princess and her new lover through a tunnel in Paris. At the other end of the tunnel after the driver had gained much speed they lost control of the car and crashed killing both passengers, one of which was Diana. Not only had they caused the untimely deaths of two people, they stopped to photograph the corpses and to write their stories instead of trying to see if anyone had survived (tabloid.net). This is a severe case of media hounding and is a practice derived from Hearst's example of how the run a company. If you ask me it is a way to not run a business. Why would you put people at risk to create a story? I guess its because of the greed factor, the world revolves around the green face of money. If people were not so power and money hungry, they we would not have these disputes over who printed the story first or who's story is better. Also being in the spotlight all the time can turn the papers against you as Hearst learned to trust no one, even if they are on your side. When running for Governor of New York his own staff reported on his past life and drudge up material that made him scorned in the public's eye (Robinson 88). This is ever the more evident in today's society were our own President is ridiculed for having extramarital activities while in the White House. This goes to show you that if our own President is not safe from slander, then no one is. His character is now forever changed, no one will remember him for cutting the deficit. He will be know for "Zipper Gate", and has been dubbed "Slick Willy" for getting away with s...