nborn entity. Therefore, abortion can be defined as the intentional killing of a human being.Pro-lifer also feel that abortions shouldnt be legal because of responsibility. They feel that in our society today abortion is becoming the careless solution. One thing that seems to brother me about pro-lifers is that there would allow woman to get abortions if there become pregnant due to rape, incest, etc. The way I see it the fetus or the embryo is still being killed. The pro-lifers have double standard when it comes to the point under what circumstances a person should have an abortion.Pro-choicers on the other hand also carry strong points. They believe that the child inside a womans body is their property and that its life doesnt begin until birth. They feel that woman should not be forced to have bodies they dont want, because it would be senseless to bring an unwanted human live into the world. They must be able to decide what happens to them and have a safe plus a legal way of doing so. Women are in control of their own bodies and lives.The pro-choice activist agrees that a womans body is her own private domain. It is a human being natural right, not a constitutional right, but a natural right, which the courts are obliged to recognize under the Ninth Amendment, to privacy: the privacy of property-real and personal-and of person.(Mark Boyer) As a pro-choice person I feel that there isnt anything more private than our own bodies. It was difficult to gain valid and subjective information on abortion, because it seems as if the majority of the research data has been mixed into personal beliefs of groups and individuals. I set out to interview a various range of citizens and professionals about this topic and to listen to their views. I did not expect to get an accurate answer to my topic, but rather to better understand the views of the pro-life and pro-choice activist. I learn new things about abortions while doing research....