mployees a feeling of trust and pride to work in an Environmentally friendly companyEmployee’s General ViewsIn the questionnaire, which I typed, many rated the office environment from 5 to 7(N0.5), (6 out of 9). But felt that they were listened to in appraisal but their views were ignored (No.17), (7 out of 9). This was one of the major “stifles” of the Andrew and Robertson staff.What is Good?In the questionnaire, which I designed many employees said they did work over their contracted hours (N.02). Question number three also asked how long the employees had been working for Andrew and Robertson’s. The answer to this question was that 3 out of the nine question said they had worked here for at least 10 years. In many companies in today’s modern environment stress is linked to overtime and boredom. In Andrew and Robertson’s employees did not have to work overtime, instead they chose to work overtime (some for Free) and explained to me that the environment was so productive some viewed it as a second home. Which is why a biggish number of questioned staff have worked for Andrew and Robertson’s for over ten years due to the reasonable pay and working hours.What are the Bad points?The office environment is generally very good, however the main worry of the majority of workers is the Workload, which from my questionnaire shows 6 out of 8 people classed their workload as Large or Extremely Large (No.08). After some advanced investigations I found that the employees did not associate their pay with the amount of work, which was completed.After observing the subjects I found out that sometimes of the large workloads angered them. But surprisingly times when they had no work to do angered them more. The generally delegation of work was poor as many people only delegated minor tasks and did not utilise (PR’s) Personal Assistants fully.Techniques UsedAs a general rule the one factor that adds value i...
