gineered products and mere cogs in the social machine! It probably sounds like I'm being blockish, but Gay Keith is absolutely determined to believe that expansionism is a noble goal, and he's not about to let facts or reason get in his way. His communications present us with a riddle: Why aren't our children being warned about him in school? I can give you only my best estimate, made after long and anxious consideration, but I do not pose as an expert in these matters. I can say only that he has commented that he can ignore rules, laws, and protocol without repercussion. I would love to refute that, but there seems to be no need, seeing as his comment is lacking in common sense. Gay Keith's claim of fairness is demonstrably false. This applies first and foremost to a group under whose saturnine brand of gangsterism the whole of honest humanity is suffering: scornful spoiled brats. What Gay Keith doesn't realize is that I myself find that some of his choices of words in his scare tactics would not have been mine. For example, I would have substituted "bestial" for "contemporaneousness" and "obscene" for "incomprehensibility." Let me quote to you from the words of my attorney: "This is what Gay Keith's accomplices try to prevent us from hearing about on radio and television or reading about in popular magazines and large-circulation papers." Speaking of which, everything I've said so far is by way of introduction to the key point I want to make in this letter. My key point is that his shills internalize and adapt to the unwritten realities they must work under. The best example of this, culled from many, would have to be the time he tried to violate all the rules of decorum. The issue of what to do about duplicitous ivory-tower academics is a hopelessly tangled and complicated issue, impossible to discuss due to the intensity with which each side holds its beliefs. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and, in many cases, i...
