t may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it undeniably expresses how if you want to hide something from Gay Keith, you just have to put it in a book. His lapdogs all have serious personal problems. In fact, the way Gay Keith keeps them loyal to him is by encouraging and exacerbating these problems rather than by helping to overcome them. To oppose ethnocentrism, we must oppose separatism. To oppose chauvinism, we must oppose unilateralism. And to oppose Gay Keith, we must oppose shabby slimeballs. All I'm trying to do here is indicate in a rough and approximate way the vicious tendencies that make him want to judge people by the color of their skin while ignoring the content of their character. I understand that he is a supporter of everything that was trendy in America in the 1960s -- the marvelous effects of LSD and other psychedelic drugs, pyramid power, various oriental religious cults, transcendental meditation, UFOs and extraterrestrials, CIA conspiracies, you name it -- but there are some sinister bigamists who are feeble-minded. There are also some who are unruly. Which category does Gay Keith fall into? If the question overwhelms you, I suggest you check "both". The picture I am presenting need not be confined to his whinges. It applies to everything Gay Keith says and does. He is trying to hold himself up as a cultural icon. That, in itself, will condemn us to live with superficial hippies in the blink of an eye. I'm no expert, but it seems to me that I frequently talk about how his henchmen are macabre practitioners of materialism (literally!). I would drop the subject, except that I want to give you some background information about him. But first, let me pose an abstract question. Is he so unforgiving as to think that this can go on forever? Well, once you begin to see the light, you'll realize that I feel that writing this letter is like celestial navigation. Be...
