When I first began this essay, I held no stance on the subject of human cloning. After my initial research, I came to the conclusion that there was no real evidence that human cloning should be illegal. My first draft however lacked good arguments. Ive since returned to the library and took a new look at the problem. And, after more research my stance was changed. Human cloning, while bringing some good, is not Gods will, and any God fearing human should consider human cloning wrong.There are many good reasons why human cloning should not be outlawed. Parents unable to have children could clone themselves. If and when human cloning becomes possible, it will represent little more than another step in reproductive technology and one that individuals would be free to choose if they desire (Hines). The children, being genetic replicas of the parents, would be true offspring. This would comfort the parents in the fact that they truly lived on through their children. This technology could also bring great things to the medical world. The technology of cloning may well allow biotechnologists to develop animals which will grow human-compatible organs for transplant. Cloning is likely to be first used to create animals that produce valuable therapeutic hormones, enzymes, and proteins (Bailey 2). These advances could save many human lives, all through cloning. The cloning of humans could also be applied to endangered animals. Cloning something as extinct as the stars of Jurassic Park remains fiction, but Lanza has just received permission from Spain to clone the bucardo, a mountain goat that became extinct when a tree fell on Celia, the last of its kind. The tissue was frozen; if it can be cloned in the egg of a common ibex, the bucardo would live again. We hope to have live bucardo kids by early summer, says Lanza (Begley 3). We could take action against the deaths of whole species. This technology could turn the world on its...