head. However, just like test tube babies were denounced in the sixtys, we now do the same with cloning. Before the technology has even entered the door, we ask it to leave by not only banning the idea but any research on it. Nevertheless, with enough research these things could be a reality in the future. A reality that would truly make the world a better place.I must admit that almost all the arguments against human cloning are very weak. What if Hitler was cloned or an army of Hilters, others go as far as to say that cloning would create a sub class of citizens. These however, are stories of science fiction. It could happen, but not really. To become truly like Hitler, a clone would not only have to be a genetic replica but also experience the same things. Our genetic code is only the beginning of who we are. Our environment adds just as much. A clone of Hitler would have to grow up in the same exact way. In addition, what factors would convince a person that clones are any less human beings? When genetic replicas, or identical twins, are born, one is not considered more human than the other is. A clone would be considered just as human as any other would, because they are. It may seam like Im arguing against myself, but there is one argument that stands above all the rest.But at the beginning of creation God made them male and female For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh, So they are no longer two, but one. Therefore what God has joined together, let man not separate (New International Version, Mark.10.6-9). These are the direct words of Jesus to the Pharisees. Clearly, this passage from the Word of God shows that he intended male and female to procreate. With cloning however, this is not needed. A woman could clone herself and carry the child until birth. Moreover, this daughter could do the same, carrying on for generations. Where ...
