at least it gives some grounds for this universal and unavoidable breaking of one of the ten commandments. But why is all this happening? Is it because our common need of feeling good, and the tendency of suspending disbelief, enables us to easily accept the lies we are told, because they are the same lies we are telling. By understanding or revealing them, we would first of all reveal ourselves and by doing it, undermine our very base of feeling good and needed. It is a kind of a social play, we all understand the unwritten rules, and we all play one way or the other.4.0 Written textWhile stating these, for some presumably inadmissible, verdicts on the collectively capitalised means of using common dialect (Dialect due to the fact that this established practise is culturally bonded and thus regionally varying prevalent usage of communication that referring to it as something other would not be without lacuna) it should also be taken in count that the same principles, although diverse from the previously encountered occurrences, do also apply to written text.Does this kind of writing seem familiar? And what did I actually say? I said that: the same thing goes for written text. I do agree that colourful and versatile usage of language is beautiful and sometimes needed for describing something exactly. But often it is used only to arouse credibility and respect, and this results as the core issue blurring, getting lost behind the pretty and convincing words. And so, to me, the whole base for the text's existence becomes questionable. Is somebody writing about the issue or merely trying to sound like an intellectual? Or are they simply so blinded by the level of language they use in their everyday life, that they do not take in consideration their readers? Whichever the case, it is very common that the quality, or level of language is the very thing blocking comprehension. Which to me seems quite odd, because the main purpose for the text ...
