t to reproductive rights, women across the country would not have access to exercise our constitutional rights (Ireland 1999). Ireland refers to the womans rights to have an abortion is constitutional but on the other hand, many look at the perspective of the unborn childs rights.The Feminists for Life of America also defends womens rights and believe they do not come at the expense of others, especially those of the womens preborn children (FFL 1998). The FFL also believes that a woman deserves the right to control her body no matter where she lives; even if shes still living inside her mothers womb (FFL 1998). Others make look at the view of there are no rights of arms or of tumors or of any piece of tissue growing within a woman, even if it has the capacity to become in time a human being(Rand qtd. in Stubblefield 1997). These two opposing sides illustrate why this issue will never be settled.Violence is another issue viewed differently among both sides of this argument. The pro-choice activists do not view the actual procedure of abortion as violence as opposed to the pro-life activists, but create violence went protesting against it. Pro-choice activists argue some anti-abortionists are violent when protesting outside of clinics, bombing clinics, and murdering abortion healthcare workers. The Pennsylvania delegates of the House of Representatives express its total condemnation of the use of such violence,commend those who are able to reasonably and rationally express opposing viewpoints through nonviolent means; andencourage all of the citizensof this commonwealth to respect the viewpoints and condemn violence(H. Res. 26 (1995) qtd. in NARAL).NOW also denotes this violence against abortion clinics and healthcare workers. Every week NOW activists and other clinic escorts across the country stand up to abortion protesters who try to block entrances to clinics and intimidate patients, doctors, and staff ...
