h century it came a new problem from the English ‘David Hue'. He said we cannot accept some important principles if they cannot be proved with sensual experience.-Also in 18th century we have a very big discussion about which is the best method, empiricism or rationalism. Which empiricist said that the starting point and basis of science is sensual experience, where rationalists said that the starting point and basis is consequent logic and the idea behind it. So finally this discussion was solved at the end of 18th century by the German philosopher ‘Emanuel Kant’, which he said that empirical experience without earlier viewpoint cannot be meaningful but rational viewpoint without sensual experience cannot be reasonable, therefor they presuppose each other.-In the first part of the 19th century the German philosopher ‘Gweder’ said that we have to investigate most important ideas and reconstruct our logic. (If we have to choose central phenomenon of life we have to change and the logic of change will explain everything, that’s why it will be united science, and we can build a great united theory about the world on the basis of logic of change).-His project was first very successful in Europe but at the end his theory turn in to specialisation because he try to explain everything without experience.-In the middle of 19th century they turn their attention to ‘Positivism’ (sensual experience start to deal with positive data, which data can be controlled by sensual experience).-After him the French philosopher ‘Agoust Compte’ established sociology, and he said that science must be critical and scientist must serve the common good. He also said the 3 levels of thinking: regional, philosophical and scientifical.-Regional: we believe in an unexistant existence (ex. God), Philosophical: we believe in independent existence of ideas (ex. Platonism), Scientifical: the order of science (1st...
